A Busy Sunday For Lender, Segarra, and Roldan

For those not up with the news over the weekend, here’s your required Monday morning reading.

First, the Courant’s Jon Lender reports that the digging done by allies of former Mayor Eddie Perez on current Mayor Pedro Segarra has yielded political fruit – Segarra hasn’t disclosed years of federal rent subsidies to his spouse, Charlie Ortiz, on city ethics forms.  Potentially worse, though, is the suggestion that Ortiz could be barred from receiving federal rent payments at all because his spouse was, first, a city councilman and, then, mayor.  Or is it just because he’s mayor?  I’m unclear there.  Looking for some insight on both from federal housing law experts.  Anybody got any?

Second, the reaction. Predictably, state representative and potential mayoral candidate Kelvin Roldan pounced.  I say predictably because it’s an FOI request from of one of his former Perez-mates that got the ball rolling.  So, again, there’s Roldan — the former Perez guy — calling Segarra out for ethics and suggesting, this time at least, criminal intent.  It’s getting to be a trend.  And Segarra responds by saying he’ll amend his ethics disclosures and seek a legal opinion, but he pretty much thinks the whole thing is bunk.  That said, he is the guy who bills himself as the transparent alternative to Perez.  (As the Hartford Advocate tells us, this is the second amendment Segarra has had to make of late.)

Quick bit of context. You’ll recall that Perez never got building permits for the work done on his house.  At the time, that was a big deal because the lack of the permits left open the question of whether Perez was deliberately trying to hide the fact that he was getting free work done on his home by a city contractor.  He’s since been found guilty on corruption-related charges dealing with the home improvements.

Also, don’t forget that Segarra and his spouse, Charlie Ortiz, had a permitting issue of their own when they forgot to get city permission to build a fence.  At the time, Segarra said that what distinguished that from the Perez work was that the work wasn’t done by a city contractor.  And, for the record, state investigators didn’t seem to come knocking.  That issue also came up right around the time that Perez was first arrested and that Segarra was trying to oust Perez ally, Council President Calixto Torres. It was a tense time.

All of this is to say that this kind of feels like familiar rhetorical ground between two old foes juiced up by the possibility that HUD’s conflict of interest guidelines could have implications for Ortiz.

I’ll have more tomorrow.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “A Busy Sunday For Lender, Segarra, and Roldan

  1. peter brush

    suggesting, this time at least, criminal intent
    ——————————————————-
    A cynical attempt to promote himself by attacking an opponent. What possible motive could Segarra have had in concealing the fact that, like most landlords here, his partner rents to subsidized tenants? And, assuming there is a possible motive, what evidence is there that Segarra had it? It’s fine to ask questions, get facts; conclusions should be drawn prudently.
    If Roldan disagrees with Segarra’s policies, would do something differently himself were he to be our Strongman, let’s hear about it. It’s not helpful to the City or its electorate to have a politician suggesting wrong-doing with no evidence. Admittedly, Pedro did something similar with respect to the School District bonus matter, but at least he was not angling for Adamowski’s job.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s